roarofthelion.jpg

Home
ALS Ice Bucket Challenge While House Is Burning
'Christ In You, The Hope Of Glory', To The Tune, 'Glory'
'The Manger Zone', To The Tune 'Danger Zone'
You Can See Clearly Now The Planks Are Gone
Isaiah 53 Explained: Mitch Glaser
'Sin Differently', To The Tune, 'Faithfully' By Journey
.
.
Nobody Loves Me Better But, ....Sing Along If Like Joel Osteen And Company
A Crown Of Gold, To The Tune Fields Of Gold
Jewish Counter Missionary Compares Messiah To Rooster
Breaking Then 'Loving The Broken' By Andy Cannon: Body Part Ministry To Silly Women (2 Tim. 3)
Table Of Contents:
The Devil Likes Hank Hannegraff
Word's Up By Rapper Cynthia, To The Tune 'Word Up'
Super Bowl
The WORD Conference
Jesus Christ Is Coming In Clouds: My Experiences At Christmas
Rocky Mountain Lie (Al Capone Ain't Such A Bad Guy)
MaxwellsHouse.Org Top Karaoke Parodies- Part Two
Jewish Wannabe: My Favorite Things
Sweet Lord Of Mine: Make A Joyful Noise With Bj
Little Billy Sings: It's A Bunch Of Bull To Me
The Outlaw: Sing Along With Little Billy
Burning Down Their House: Sing Along With Jumpin Jack Jr.
What A Wonderful God: Under His Rainbow...Sing Along With Little Cindy
Fiddling With 'Fiddler On The Roof.'
Expose Them With God's Light, And Talk To The Aminals
Jewish Counter Missionary: These Are A Few Of My Favorite Things
Does eating MEAT make one fat?
BoldFingers Meets 'Super-Apostle': Sing Along
Pastorized To The Tune, 'Too Shy'
God's Healthcare Together: Death Panels Already Exist
Before Judaism It Was Better: Sing Along
It's More Blessed To Give And Receive!
"If A Picture Paints A Thousand Words..."
Dad Knew That, 'This Is Family:' Sing Along
If The Plain Sense/P'shat Makes Sense, Don't Mince/Panache
You Might Be An Illegal Immigrant Or His/Her Enabler If :
Just Like Those Egyptians: The Ex. Files
Drier Ground Or Ye Are Gods?
There Ought To Be NO Mormons After
Special Ed: Sing With Little Billy
Plain Sense Indicator: Mormonism
Maxwell's House Spiritual Virus Checker
Preterists/Gnostics And 'The Man Down Under': Sing Along
The Apostasy: What Is It?
Maxwell's House: Goods For Your Desktop
Take Your Kids To Branson And Save Them From Hell
Isaiah 53: Explained By Mitch Glaser...My Critique
The Branson Experiment
I Am The Virus: Sing Along
Why Do It God's Way?, To The Tune 'I Did It My Way'
What's The Matter In Your Eye, You Cookie Cutting, Half Truth Wielding Wonder?
The Name: Sing Along....One Faith For All
Your 'Jesus' Is Simply Way Too Small (2 Cor. 11)
My 12 Hates Of Christ-Miss, To The Tune Of 12 Days Of Christmas
The Great Offending Gold Plaited Turds, Meet The Great Conformers In The Anals Of History
As Cain Slew His Brother To The Lord Yeshu, Columbo Suspects The Highly (H)Acidic Jews
He Will Stomp You From We Will Rock You
The Age Of Hilarious: Sing Along
That's Agape: Sing Along
You Aint Seen Someone Yet: Sing With Porky
We Didn't Pick The Choir, But Revived The Muslim Fire
You Deserve An Oscar, Golden Calf Or Degenerate Award Then Put Billions In Research, When...
Fruitcake Stew Number Two, For Hopeless Liberals And Fruitcakes Like George And The View:
Differences Between The Body Of Christ And Israel
Should We Major On The Minors, And Minor On The Majors?
What Happens When Christians Strain At Gnats, Swallow Camels, Embrace Shadows, Major On The Minors?
One: The Paradigm For All Things
Gave Our Breath Away/The Trinity And The Trichotomy Of Man In Song
Where Are You Located On This Chart?
The Answer Lies In, How This Story Begins: Avoiding The Fiddler On The Roof
My, My How The Whole Truth Divides!!
Nifty Ways They Replace Scripture: Sing Along
I Took The High Way: Sing Along
Bible Difficulties
I Wish They All Could Be Roman Catholic Girls: Sing Along With Papa Bj
Paper Lions, Doggy Doorways To The Tune, 'Paper Roses'
Prophecy And Mystery
The Spiritually Challenged Coming Full Circle
Very Superficial And He's Got Teddy Haggard's Smile
Professional Christian To The Tune American Woman
Had I Come Back Before, Sing Along
Ghost Writers In The Sky: Sing Along
'I Make It Rhyme' To The Tune 'I Walk The Line'
Total Recall Of You All: I.E. The Religious And Jewish Wannabes
Pretribber: Sing Along
The Divine Authorship Of The Old And New Testament
You're A Jewish Counter Missionary Or Enabler If You:
'Rightly Divided' Chart
Arguments Against The Trinity Trounced
Your Own Poison-All Jesus
Come As We Are Ministries
Publicans And DUMacrats Ask: What's This Hole In My Head?
Cynthia's Corner
Here's Some Great News My Friend
Undercover Christian
If Three Just Don't Agree, Then The Two Will Surely Do
Know When You're Done
The Eight Day Week And Keeping The Holi-Days Holy
The Departure: What Is It?
Group Think Or Whosoever Will Part 3
Jewish Wannabe:These Are A Few Of MY Favorite Things
Melchisedek Medley: Sing Along
How Many Times Is Christ Coming?
BOC Chart 2
B.O.C. 3
Children Of A Lesser Fraud: Should We Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils?
The Replacement Killers
Are You Odd Because You're God's?
A Boy Named YESHU: Sing Along With J.C. (Not Jimmy Carter)
Jesus On Main Street/City Lights Coffeehouse
Maxwells House Photos
Circles Of Life
The Andy Man Can With Frank N Clown's Lurch And Its Unleashed Body Parts
Found Me My Baby Giver; Start Your Own Church
Under One Roof: Start a House Church
Let Her Be: Sing Along
HollowWood's HollowLujah's Shows They Never Knew Yah
Maxwell's House: Goods For Your Desktop
'All' Men Means Just Some Men If Of Calvin: Sing Along
My Pardon Party: Will You Come?
Tebow Knows/ Focus on the Family Or On God?
We'll Love You, If Like Us You Are: Sing Along
This Old CoffeeHouse
Behind All Those Doors At Miles Apart Ministries
Live And Let Christ: About Us
In Those Three Days, Christ Saved Me From The Fire
I Am Jesus, And I Right The Wrongs: Sing Along
Christians 'Roasting On An Open Fire': Sing With Little Billy
Simply Can't Change Your Chromosomes That Way
There Should Have Been A Warning, After: Sing Along
Twelve Angry Men (Jurors) And The Roar Of The Lion
Violence Of The Hams And The Preachers Of Another Jesus (2 Corinthians 11)
Really Hot As, Hell-Ooooooooo!!
Little Angel Cindy Knows, Do You Know?

Roar Of The Lion And Twelve Angry Men

Roar Of The Lion
 
To Sing Karaoke Click Here, Then Minimize To Sing With New Lyrics Below

If You Need Help Bj Sings Below, Just Scroll To End Of Song Then Click.
 
Feel Free To Post Unaltered Anywhere And Everywhere.

Formerly 'Eye Of The Tiger'

This Is Legal Read Bottom Of Song

Love To The Father, Son And Holy Spirit For Inspiring Me And Giving Me Purpose.

New Title By Bj Maxwell

New And More Appropriate Lyrics By Bj Maxwell

Love And Thanks To My Wife Cynthia For Her Love And Support.

Old Lyrics By Peterik/Sullivan

Sung By Survivor

New Lyrics In Black

Sung By Bj Maxwell

Links In Green

 

 
Roar Of The Lion


Butterfly, Floats And Bee Stings


Nobody's Greater Than He.

Without Question


Glad I Didn't Retreat!!


Former Juror And Real Thrilled To See My Wife.


Too Many Times, It Happens Too Much


You Get Your Summons By Mail


Don't You Forget All Your Goals From Above.

(Col. 3:2,3)


You Are Right, Keep Them All By Your Side.

(Philippians 3:12-15)


[Chorus]


It's The Roar Of The Lion

(Phil. 1:6)


No Bad Lawyers In Sight.

(Deuteronomy 17:6; 19:15; Matthew 18:15-20; 2 Cor. 13:1)

God Calls Us To His Challenge


From The Bible

(Phil. 4:4-9)


And The Divine Creator


Guides His Flock 'Through The Night'

(Hebrews 13:20)


And he's Guiding Me With The


Roar Of The Lion

(Rev. 5:5-10)



Face To Face, Back On My Beat

 

 

Pushin Love, Truth Rejoicin

(1 Cor. 13:6)


They Know I'm  Odd

(1 Peter 2:9)


'Still I Take To The Street'


Got God's Zeal, And God's Skill To Survive.


[Chorus]

 

It's The Roar Of The Lion


All Good Lawyers He Guides.

(Deuteronomy 17:6; 19:15; Matthew 18:15-20; 2 Cor. 13:1)


God Calls Us To His Challenge


From The Bible


And The Divine Creator


Guides His Flock 'Through The Night'


And he's Guiding Me With The


Roar Of The Lion





Raptures Here, Straight To The Top.

(1 Thess. 4:16,17)


Felt The Pain , Now To Glory

(2 Tim. 2:12)


Now The High Prize

Blessings Over The Top

(1 Cor. 2:9,10)


'Just A Man With' God's 'Will To Survive.'

[Chorus]


It's The Roar Of The Lion


No Bad Lawyers In Sight.

(Deuteronomy 17:6; 19:15; Matthew 18:15-20; 2 Cor. 13:1)


God Calls Us To His Challenge


From The Bible


And The Divine Creator


Guides His Flock 'Through The Night'


And he's Guiding Me With The


Roar Of The Lion



The Roar Of The Lion

The Lion Of Judah

(2x)

New Lyrics By Bj Maxwell

Support And Prayer From Cynthia Maxwell

12/03/2011

12/04/2011

07/24/2014

Copyright ©

If You Don't Automatically Hear Music, Then Click Here, And Minimize Music To Sing Along With The New Lyrics Below.

"The 1961 Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the U.S. Copyright Law cites examples of activities that courts have regarded as FAIR USE: "quotation of excerpts in a review or CRITICISM FOR PURPOSES OF ILLUSTRATION OR COMMENT; quotation of short passages in a scholarly or technical work, for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations; USE IN A PARODY OF SOME OF THE CONTENT OF THE WORK PARODIED..."

http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html

The Following I Put Together To Chronicle My Experiences As A Juror, And As Self Therapy To Recover From The Experience.

12 Angry Men

Watch Here.

Twelve Angry Men Was A Classic Movie, Fictional But Classic.

 I Say Fictional Because It's Not Based On A True Story And

I Doubt That One Juror Could Convince Eleven Other Jurors

 Contrary To Their Conclusions Made Before, During The Trial

 And During The Deliberations That He's On To The Truth And

They Are Not, Whether Or Not He Was In Actuality On To

The Truth Or Not.

This Is Devoted To Why I Came To My Conclusions, Not Why I Believe The Other Eleven Were Wrong During A Trial And Jury Deliberation That I Was Participating In.

Do You Know?

 

1. "To Have A Clear Perception Or Understanding Of; Be Sure Of Or Well Informed About [To Know The Facts]-New World Dictionary

In The Trial I Was A Part Of, The Jury And Even The Judge Couldn't Or Wouldn't Define 'Reasonable' Doubt For Us, So We Each Had To Invidually Answer This Question For Ourselves.

After The Fact And After Looking At The Definitions Which I Wasn't Allowed While In Jury Deliberations I Believe Guilty Without A 'Reasonable' Doubt, Means That You Know Something. I Could Never Say I Knew The Defendant Was Guilty, Given The Incomplete 'Evidence', And During All The Evidence Being Presented And Being Debated In Deliberations, My 'Presumption Of Innocence' Remained Intact And The Same Alternative Explanation Was Always Possible When Looking At The Evidence.

My Alternative Explanation Of The Evidence Was That The Defendant Was A Patsy That Until After The Arrest Didn't Know What Was In The Car She Was Driving And Legally Speaking, Registered To Someone Else, And The Person That Legally Owned The Vehicle Was Responsible For Hiding The Drugs In The Car, With Only Someone At The Final Destination Point Knowing What Was In The Car. The Reason The Defendant Didn't Spill The Beans Once Being Used Was That She Was Either Afraid Of The Repercussions From The Actual Guilty Party Or She Didn't Want The Investigation To Include Her Girlfriend And Go From State To Federal.

Do I Know All This To Be True?

Of Course Not, But Simply Being Able To Provide A Reasonable Alternative Explanation Shows That The Evidence Doesn't Just Point In One Direction.

Is Knowing 100%?

I Don't Think So.

I Think All Earthly Knowing Is Based On Probability.

Do I Have To Know She's Innocent?

No, The Presumption Is Innocence Until Proven Guilty Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. -To Know She's Guilty, From The Evidence.

'From The Evidence' Is A Relative Judgment.

Whether She's Guilty In Reality Beyond The Evidence Is An Objective Judgment Which We Don't Have The Ability To Make, But Her Guilt Is Either Fact Or Not A Fact.

God Knows, But We Can Only Deal With The Presented Evidence.

I Considered What Others Said, And Personally Wanted To Be Done With The Whole Process, But Since, I Would Want A Jury For Myself That Is Truly Considering The Evidence, If I'm Ever Tried, So Should I Do This For Any Defendant.

'Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do To You'

This In Essense Is What All Religions And Even Secular Society Teaches, So None Can Legitimately Claim I'm Getting Religious In Referring To This Golden Rule.

In The Fictional Movie 12 Angry Men, The Jury Had Much More To Overcome Than I Did In My Jury Duty. The Movie Showed Reasonable And Alternative Explanations For All The 'Evidence' Presented To Them, And I Didn't See It A Stretch To Come To Those Alternative Explanations.

Evolutionists And Creationists Argue Over The Same Evidence. One Says Little Water Lots Of Time, While The Other Says, Lots Of Water And Little Time. Context Is Important, And Over And Over The Context Was Not Provided For The So Called Evidence In The Trial.

I Couldn't Share Everything I Thought Because I Would Be Labled A Religious Nut And Then Be Alienated. The Statement Above Got All Kinds Of Resistance From Two Women In The Group.

I Also Believe That 'Knowing' Comes Through The Mind And The Heart.

I Know I'm Saved, Yes I Do.

Little Cindy Sings, Do You Know

I Know It Beyond A Reasonable Doubt, I Don't Know It Beyond Unreasonable Doubts.

When I'm Being Rebellious, I'm Still Saved But I Don't Feel Saved.

"Those Don't Know They Have Eternal Life Either:

1) Are Presently Acting Like Ones That Don't Know, But Know, God Is Faithful Though They Are Faithless. (2 Timothy 2:13; Phil. 1:6; Romans 8)"

There Are Also Other Things i.e. Listening To The Wrong People i.e. Those That Don't Know, That Can Lead To Doubting Ones Salvation.

"4) Are Listening To Those That Don't Know , Who Only Know That They Don't Know And Want Everyone Else Not To Know Too. (Psalm 1:1; Galatians 2:4,5)"

http://maxwellshouse1.tripod.com/id95.html

 

"Blessed is the man

who DOES NOT WALK IN THE COUNSEL OF THE WICKED or stand in the way of sinners or sit in the seat of mockers." (Psalm 1:1)

Though I Did, Should I Listen To Folks That Don't Know What 'Knowing' Is?

Probably Not.

One's Relation With God Or Lack Of It Affects Ones View Of Everything Else.

"But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin.

8 If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us.

9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins

and purify us from all unrighteousness. 10 If we claim we have not sinned,

we make him out to be a liar and his word has no place in our lives." (1 John 1:7)

"Your word is a LAMP to my feet and a light for my path." (Ps. 119:105)

If One Doesn't Consult The Word When Making Decisions, Then They Stumble Because They Can't See.

"know·ing, noun

verb (used with object)

1.

to perceive or understand as fact or truth; to apprehend clearly and with certainty: I know the situation fully."

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/know

The Most Difficult Evidence To Deal With Was A Phone Call That The Defendant Made To Someone In California.

She Either Was Stating That She Was Guilty Or That The Police Already Deemed Her Guilty Or Knowing She Was Being Recorded Accepted Her Fate, So As To Not Get The Investigation To Extend To California.

After Being Told By The One On The Other Side Of The Phone That Everything Is Being Recorded, She Immediately Said The Investigation Is Staying In State And Not Going Federal And That 'Its All On Me' And 'They Already Know I Did It.'

We Listened To This Conversation Over And Over, Mainly For My Benefit Because The Rest Of The Jury ALREADY KNEW She Was Guilty While I Didn't Know That. My Definition Of 'Know' Is Obviously Different Than Theirs.

'They Already Know' Can Just Mean, They've Already Made Their Mind Up Or That The Defendant Was Just Accepting Her Fate Or That Because It's Gone State, She Might As Well Take The Blame, Because She Ends The Call With, 'Whatever.'

All The Rest Of The Evidence Was Incomplete, And Though It Established That She Had Meth In The Car, It Didn't Establish That She Was Aware Of It. So Called Confessions, Not Signed Or Recorded, No Fingerprints Taken Of The Panel Or Drugs That Were Confiscated, No Test For Traces Of Drugs On The Cash She Had, No Drug Testing Of The Defendant, Concluding That Her Shivering Was Because She Was Afraid The Drugs Would Be Discovered, (Though She Gave Permission To The Police To Inspect), And Not Shivering Because It Was A Cold Day, Which It Was, And It Was Or Not Shivering Because She Had A Suspended License Which She Had. Also Greatly Slowing Down Greatly When She Saw The Police Meant I Have Drugs, Though The Cop Had Initially Said She Could Go, And Not Because She Had A Suspended License, Which She Had.

If You Want To Read More Scroll Down, But This Is The Gist Of It.

The Police Are To Be Greatly Commended For Discovering And Confiscating These Drugs.

Assumptions, Presumptions And Dysfunctions.

We All Have Them Whether We Admit It Or Not.

The Only Question Is Whether We Have To Ability To See Beyond Our Assumptions, Presumptions And Dysfunctions And Come To 'Reasonable' Conclusions Or Reasonably Deduce That Our 'Presumption Of Innocence' Still Reasonably Remains Intact Despite The So Called Evidence.

One Of My Assumptions And Presumptions At The Beginning, During The Trial And Even After Deliberations Was That The Defendant We Were Considering Was 'Innocent Until Proven Guilty.'

I Took It Seriously And Wasn't Just Interested In Getting Home.

Evidence That Demands More Questions:

Personally, The Evidence Provided Left Much To Be Desired, Was Intentionally Incomplete, Raised More Questions Than It Answered, And Did Not Demand A Guilty Verdict But More Questions As To Why This, This And This Wasn't Done By The Police And What Did This Statement Mean In Context.

Why It Didn't Raise As Many Questions For Them As It Did For Me Is For Another Message, But My Questions Seemed Obvious Enough That If The Answers Were Not Provided (And They Weren't) I Couldn't Reasonably, Contextually And In Good Conscience Declare The Defendant Guilty. Had I Got My Answers Or Adequate Answers I Would Have Been Able To Determine The Context In Which Things Happened Or Were Said And Could Determine It Means This And Not That.

Regarding Religious Issues, I Don't Believe As Liberals Believe That When We Read And Study The Bible For Instance That We Can Come To Numerous And Equally Valid Interpretations, Because I Believe The Evidence In The Bible Is Overwhelming For Any True Seeker To Come To The Right Interpretation Over The Wrong One, But In This Court Case The Evidence Was Not Sufficient. (2 Timothy 2:15-17)

It's Very Difficult To Express Your Views Completely When Eleven Others Disagree With You. Interruptions Happened On Both Sides But At Times I Felt I Had To Interrupt And Raise My Voice To Be Heard Over Eleven Other Voices That Disagreed With Me. This Is Not An Indictment Of The Other Side, Only The Nature Of Being In The Minority.

We All Agreed That The Evidence Proved That There Were Drugs Found In The Vehicle This Person Was Driving, Because The Original Driver Was Sick.

So The Question Of The Group Was Whether The Driver At The Time Was Aware That Drugs Were Stashed Out Of View And Inside The Panels Of The Car.

The Primary Officer Stationed In The Median Of The Highway Says That When She Quickly Slowed Down After She Saw Him That This Told Him That This Meant She Knew She Was Transporting Drugs.

If So, Then Why After This Did He Say She Could Go, Before He Asked Whether He Could Inspect For Drugs?

Again, Someone Quickly Slowing Down When They See A Cop, Doesn't Necessarily Mean That They Are Transporting Drugs. It Could Mean That They May Be Speeding Or Driving With A Suspended License, Which She Was.

It Was Stated That She Recently Purchased The Car, Though The Car Was Still Registered To Someone Else In Another State, And Insurance Was Being Provided By Still Another Party.

The Evidence Raised More Questions Than It Answered. For The Others It Might Or Might Not Have Been Enough But For Myself I Couldn't See How Anyone Could Be Satisfied With The 'Evidence' Provided, Without Wanting To Know The Context In Which Things Were Said Or Done, Being That The Answer Would Obviously Determine How One Would Interpret The Evidence.

Evolutionists And Creationists Look At The Same Evidence And Draw Two Different Conclusions. One Concludes A Little Water And Lots Of Time While The Other Concludes Lots Of Water And Little Time.

Context Is Essential.

Twelve Angry And/Or Frustrated Persons

Whether The Defendant In Question Is Guilty Of The Crime Has A Definite Answer, Whether The Evidence That Was Presented Proves Guilt Beyond A Reasonable Doubt, Can Only Be Determined Per Each Individual And Their Own Understandings And Experiences, So Therefore Is A Relative Not Absolute Determination.

I Applaude And Appreciate Our Law Enforcement Officers Who Intercept Drugs Coming Into The United States And Into Particular States. They Greatly Deserve Our Eternal Gratitude. The Same Goes For The Officers Who Intercepted These Drugs Coming Into Our State And The D.A. When He Tries To Find The Real Perpetrators. However, In Looking At The Evidence Provided I Found No Satisfactory Link Between The One Driving The Vehicle And The Drugs, That Would Tell Me That She Knowingly Drove This Car Conscious That Drugs Were Hidden Inside This Car. Apparently She Was Driving In Place Of Her Girlfriend Who Was Sick.

The Law Itself Tells Us That There Is A Difference Between 'Reasonable Doubt' And 'Shadow Of A Doubt' Between Criminal Law And Civil Law. The Difference Is In Relation To The Stakes. One Involves Money The Other Ones Guilt And Future. This Is Not What I'm Saying, These Are The Distinctions The Law Already Makes.

I'm In No Way, Shape Or Form An Expert In These Matters, But I Think I Know What 'Reasonable' And 'Doubt' Is, Which Goes Beyond Legal Boundaries.

I Shared With The Defense And The Prosecution Lawyers And Judge In Front Of My Peers And In Private, My Experiences With The Police About Twenty Years Ago Which Made Me A More Objective Observer, Which Understood That There Are Bad And Good People, Hard Workers And Lazy Workers In Every Profession, Including Law Enforcement. Even After Sharing My Experiences With Bad Cops Twenty Years Ago, Both The Prosecution And Defense Still Chose To Select Me As A Juror, Which I Gladly Accepted.

I Shared With The Jury After Deliberations Started What Would Lead Me To Believe That The Defendant Was Guilty Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. I Never Even Got To First Base In Being Shown That She Was Conscious That Drugs Were Hidden In Her Car And She Was More Than Just An Ignorant Patsy, Until After The Drugs Were Discovered And She Had Three Days In Jail To Think About It.

After The Deliberations And The Declaration Of A Hung Jury, While I Was Talking To The Primary Officer Involved, He Agreed That There Were More Involved, He Just Thought The Defendant Was Still A Member Of This Drug Pushing Group. I Differed Thinking That She Was Used But Unaware Until After The Drugs Were Discovered And She Had Three Days In Jail To Think About To Know Who Dunnit.

Here Were My Questions:

After The Officer Discovers The Drugs:

Why Weren't The Panels Fingerprinted?

The Prosecutions Answer:

Because Many Surfaces Wouldn't Allow For Successful Fingerprinting And Statistics Say That Only A Small Amount Of The Time Do Fingerprints Show Up.

The Defense Answers:

There Are Surfaces In That Panel And On The Boxes Of The Drugs Itself That Could Have Been Successfully Fingerprinted.

Finding The Drivers Fingerprints On The Boxes Of These Drugs Or On These Panels Would Have Reasonably Shown Me Guilt Of The Defendant And Only Helped The Prosecutions Case.

The Driver Had About 1500 Dollars Cash On Her Person.

I Carry Cash Like This On My Person When I Vacation.

Why Wasn't The Cash Tested For Traces Of Drugs?

The Prosecutions Answer:

They Didn't Think It Necessary, And It Wouldn't Have Proven Much.

My Answer:

The Police Had Three Hours To Do This Investigation And Decided Not To Do Many Important Things, At Least Important To Me And Had Traces Of Drugs Been Found On The Cash Or The Defendant Been Tested Positively For Drugs i.e. Meth, I Would Have Agreed With My Peers And Declared Her Guilty.

The Police Said, That When They Asked Her Whether She Had Particular Drugs In Her Vehicle Three Different Times Regarding Three Different Kinds Of Drugs She Answered With 'No', Until The Third Time When Asked About Meth And She Said, 'No, No, No' Which Meant According To This Cop, 'Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes'

Defense Response:

Maybe She Was Frustrated At Being Asked Three Times And Responded With, 'No, No, No'.

"17 He SAID TO HIM THE THIRD TIME, "Simon, son of John, DO YOU LOVE ME?" Peter was grieved because He said to him

the third time, "Do you love Me?" And he said to Him, "Lord,

You know all things ; You know that I love You." Jesus said to him, "

Tend My sheep." (John 21)

Another Officer Allegedly Got Her Confession In Writing, That Her Girlfriend Had Nothing To Do With It.

For Some This Meant My Girlfriend Had Nothing To Do With It So Therefore I Did.

This Alleged Statement Was Never Signed By Her And Wasn't Recorded.

Was This Statement An Admission Of Her Own Guilt Or Was She Just Trying To Get Her Girlfriend Off?

I Have To Say That Even Though I Know Same Sex Relationships To Be Immoral And Wrong (Romans 1), This Trial Wasn't About Her Sexual Choices, It Was About Her Transportation Of Drugs.

If I Was Arrested And My Wife Was There, I Would Try To Get Her Off, Whether I Was Guilty Or Not.

Next They Say She Was Shiverring As If Frightened.

Elsewhere In The Trial They Said This Was A Cold Day.

They Wanted Us To Believe That She Was Shivering Because She Knew The Drugs Were In The Vehicle, Not Because It Was Cold And Not Because She Was Driving With A Suspended Licence (Which She Was). I Don't Believe One Can Derive Only One Interpretation From This Shivering.

Though Not Testifying In Court, The Defendant Declared Not Guilty.

Also During The Incident, The Officer Said She Could Go But Can He Inspect The Car. She Said He Could. This Tells Me That She Didn't Know The Drugs Were In The Car.

'The Jurors Who Already Knew She Was Guilty Before Even Deliberating, Said Well, She Only Did That Because She Thought The Officer Wouldn't Find The Drugs.

I Determined That This Action On Her Part Determined That She Didn't Know Because We Have No Reason To Believe That She Thought He Wouldn't Be Able To Discover Those Drugs Once He Started His Inspection And He Had Already Told Her She Could Go If She Wanted.

Remember 'Presumption Of Innocence' Not Presumption Of Guilt, So Explaining Away (Without Evidence) Things That Point To Her Innocence Is Wrong, While Not Accepting Things Done Or Said Out Of Context, Or Intentionally Incomplete Is The Duty Of Those That Presume Innocence.

The Piece Of Evidence That Sold All The Fence Riders And Got Me Closest To Declaring Guilt Was A Phone Conversation She Made While In Jail, Three Days After The Drugs Had Been Discovered And After Previous Conversations On The Phone.

Turns Out That Jails Like This One Actually, Monitor And Record Phone Conversations Like The One The Defendant Made.

In It She's Answering A Question That Must Have Been Asked By Someone She Calls 'Mom' In A Previous Phone Conversation Not Submitted By The Prosecution. She Tells The One From California Who Seems Concerned, From Which She Came, That The Case Is Going State Not Federal, The Defendant Was Told By The One Of The Other Side That The Conversation Is Being Recorded' She Responds With 'I Know' Then Right After That 'Its On Me', 'They Already Know It's Me, Whatever.' She Might Have Been Still Interested In Keeping Her Girlfriend Out Of Jail.

This Tells Me That Because It's Gone State, That Its All On The Defendant, And Won't Extend To California And That For That Reason, It's On Her, And The Police After Only Three Days Somehow Already 'Know It's Me', Which Can Either Mean, She Is Guilty Or That The Police Have Already Made Their Mind Up That It's Her And That She's Assuring Her Mother, Girlfriend Or Someone Else Over The Phone That They Need Not Worry.

The Defendant Was Already Told The Message Is Being Recorded, So It Seems Extremely Stupid Or Lost All Hope, If She Is Admitting Guilt In These Statements Rather Than Just Easing The Fears Of Someone In California.

She Looks Like A Patsy Unaware Of What Was Going On Higher Up, And No One In Law Enforcement Seems Interested In Biting The Head Off Of The Beast.

The Other Jurors Say This Means She Knows Something. I Say Of Course, After Drugs Being Discovered In The Car And Three Days To Think About It And Previous Conversations Not Submitted To The Jury, One Should Know Something About 'It'.

The Jurors When I Asked The Jury, They Said That I Should Stick With My Convictions And Not Give In Because I Was Outnumbered. I Shouldn't Take A 'Whatever' Attitude And Go With The Herd. I Concurred And Hope That All Innocent Persons, Jurors And Fellow Earthlings Will Not Lose Hope Accepting What The Majority Are Saying Or Thinking And Persevere In Their Well Thought Out And Heart Felt Convictions.

During The Trial I Was Looking At The Defendant To See How She Responded To Different Statements And Questions. She Was Like A Zombie, Never Showing Any Kind Of Emotion. After The Hung Jury At Our Last Court Gathering She Was Dressed Better, Makeup On And Smiling And With A Look Of Great Hope And Gratefulness. After Nine Months In Jail And Time To Think She Looked Hopeful. I Believe She Was A Patsy And No Attempt Was Made To Investigate Who The Car Was Registered To Or Figure Out Who Is On The Other Side. Though, The Officer Ought To Be Greatly Commended For Intercepting These Drugs And Get Nothing But Our Thanks, The Prosecutor Did A Great Job As Well. I Personally Believe That There Just Should Have Been An Attempt To Find Out Who Was On The Other Side.

I Didn't Believe Anyone Was Answering My Questions Regarding Why She Made Statements Right After Being Told She Was Being Recorded On The Phone, And Her 'Whatever' Statement. Also That The Conversation Was Referring To A Previous Conversation That Wasn't Provided. So In Good Conscience I Couldn't Declare Her Guilty. 

Sometimes The Only Way You Can Be Heard Is At The Risk Of Appearing To Be An Ass. Due To Not Getting Questions Answered, That Ended Up Being The Case.

"All the other body parts laughed at the rectum And insulted him, so in a huff, he shut down tight. Within a few days, the brain had a terrible headache, the stomach was bloated, the legs got wobbly, the eyes got watery, and the blood Was toxic. They all decided that the rectum should be 'Heard'"
.

Group Think :

 "A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive ingroup, when the members' strivings for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action" (Janis, 1972).

Irving Janis And Group Think:

 

"Better 10 Guilty Men Go Free than to Convict a Single Innocent Man"

"The essence of this quote forms the very cornerstone of the system of justice that separates the United States from virtually every other civilized nation. Think about the presumption of innocence; the requirement of proof beyond reasonable doubt; the requirement of a unanimous jury verdict. These core elements of our system of criminal justice all flow directly from the premise that the wrongful conviction of a single innocent person is ten times worse than a guilty person going unpunished.

Many of us are instinctively patriotic; downright "‘jingoistic" about the protections afforded us by the Bill of Rights: the right to be free from unlawful search and seizure of our person or effects; the right to remain silent if accused of wrongdoing; the right to be represented by counsel; the right to a trial by jury."

http://knowledgebase.findlaw.com/kb/2009/Jun/CS060809.html

 

Watch The Remake Of 12 Angry Men Here.

More Coming Up

.